Wednesday, January 27, 2010

How To Make A3 Diper Cake

The privatization of the world - Interview with Jean Ziegler

from the book "The privatization of the world " Jean Ziegler
Raiders, Raiders, and mercenaries of the global market
What is the strength of a state and more specifically of a democratic state?

First idea it embodies.

In a stratified society in which we deal with the interests of antinomic opposing social classes, democratic state, through multiple mechanisms (redistributive taxation, social security etc..) Cotinuamente try to soften and make it more livable interdependence asymmetric between individuals. The citizens of the state and adhere to its rules, its decision-making procedures, to the extent that they derive a practical benefit. A state that gives its citizens a sense of security by ensuring a minimum level of income and social stability and the foreseeable future, and does not warrant a public order in accordance with their moral convictions, is a state prisoner.

In many states, public transport, posts and telecommunications have been privatized. A second wave of privatization is preparing against schools, universities, hospitals, prisons and soon police. A state which voluntarily dismantled its most essential public services and transfers to the private sector respond to the tasks of collective interest, thus subjecting the law of profit maximization, is a "failed state".

to the citizens of its value is close to zero. An economy that generates (and celebrating) the individual competition with a vengeance, job insecurity, the weakness of articles of association, the wages of merit, is an economy generating anxieties. A city left without protection faces major social risks losing its status as a citizen, a man who constantly afraid of losing his job, his salary and his rights is not a free man. The privatization of the state destroys human freedom and destroys citizenship.

This is because the new strategies of accumulation and exploitation of predators causing terrible damage in the fabric of national economies. states, even the most powerful, they are obliged to cede their territory, through fiscal policies and fiscal, to the dictates of the transnational industrial and financial companies. If they did would be immediately sanctioned by the end of international investment and a massive flight of capital. As a spring river in flood, the formidable vitality of finance capital over all barriers, sweeps away all the powers of the state and destroys the ordered landscapes. Now governments, even the richest and most powerful states, they have no other choice but to contribute to "global domestic policy" can not help but translate into the local language, through a set of institutional decisions, the diktat of the Lords the world. Above the governments, parliaments, judges, journalists, trade unions, intellectuals, churches, armies, scientists reign as the financial markets. So then the public institutions are emptied of their blood and the republic suffers from anemia.
Jean Ziegler

Monday, January 25, 2010

Saint Bernard Vs Newfoundland

Umberto Galimberti

philosophy could save us indeed. Close

faculty '"useless" as a philosophy, literature, sociology,' cause considered without job opportunities, and 'a serious mistake.

Thought and 'basic and whether a thinker can not find job opportunities should be financed from the state! You should never turn off the brain only 'cause it does not generate profit "loss".

We must learn to distinguish between wealth and money!

Enjoy

Friday, January 22, 2010

Insurance Broker Intro Sample Letter

on young people return to the real fight

di Paolo Barnard

“Sono convinto che se vogliamo metterci dalla parte giusta della rivoluzione mondiale, noi dobbiamo sottoporci a una radicale rivoluzione di valori. Dobbiamo rapidamente allontanarci da questa società centrata sui beni, e andare verso una società centrata sulle persone. Quando le macchine, i computer, i profitti, e i diritti di proprietà sono considerati più importanti delle persone, i tre mostri del razzismo, materialismo estremo e militarismo non possono più essere sconfitti”.

Martin Luther King disse queste parole a New York, nella Riverside Church, il 4 Aprile 1967. The thing that strikes me so much of that passage is its appeal forty-three years ago so we decided to walk away from the model of society based on the existence Commercial, precisely the model triumphant today. This, more than anything else, gives us the measure of our failure, the failure of left intellectuals and activists. The results are there for all to see.

King, the night before his death, namely April 3, 1968, spoke to a crowd in Memphis. Among other things, he told her years before when he was stabbed by a black woman during the presentation of a book. The blade of the knife touched his severely damaged aorta. After the surgery the doctors told him that if he had sneezed in those tragic minutes, he would die. The fact was picked up by newspapers. Some time later, Luther King received a letter, which was written: "Dear Dr. King, I am a student of the first White Plains High School. I know I should not count, but I say I'm a white girl. I read in the newspapers of his misfortune and his suffering. And I read that if you had sneezed, he would die. The'm just writing to say that I am so happy that she has not sneezed. "

The black leader was almost killed by a sister of his race, not by a white racist, and found the courage in those few lines to continue, its immense courage. The same courage that had students of color in 1960 when they decided en masse in every state in the southern United States to sit at the cafeteria for whites only. The same courage that the students had left Chile in 1973, continued to meet despite the terror. The same courage that took the Polish workers in Gdansk and young Czechs in Prague despite the mouths of cannon Soviet. One could go on.

Remember: a letter of paper, a postage stamp. Nothing could be more insignificant among the means to help a revolution. The difference made her courage. We faced the hanging of the nooses of racists then, we do not face the torture of DINA, Pinochet, we do not face the tanks. And we must defeat three hundred years of segregation, a neo-Nazi regime or a Stalinist empire. But we are at stake as perhaps never before in contemporary history, facing fewer enemies well, discouraged by obstacles that none of us will die of torture and mass graves, as was unfortunately for millions before us.

We have no excuses us, with our carrier information and saved our asses. I already said that we need to stop taking drugs obsessive information in this web-trap, and you must take to the streets to be heard in places of real life, in offices, hospitals, palaces of power, factories, schools and universities, or helping those in need, with the same tenacity and perseverance of those who suffered to give us the freedom we have. As American blacks Luther King sat in that table and refused to move, so are we to do in other places, and refuse to move if we do not see fulfilled our rights. Being in mass makes a difference, as he did for them, of course, we should get to be in any given instance, and to perseverance, that is not melt in the sun as is the custom after a few months of typical Italian enthusiasm. But also fight alone or in a few counts, and not be exempt us from having to do so, as did millions before us. If not, we are committed so-called ridiculous, the first ridiculous 'Revolutionaries' of history, the 'keyboard'.

For this reason I take off from my keyboard, I will write very often, I refuse to throw myself more coal into the locomotive dell'obnubilamento house that is for me the Web is a huge sacrifice, because writing is my life. But here again: "retire to our homes and ask to cry because I can no longer change my time?" . You again here in ... I do not know. In the meantime, and before that we meet in places of real life, each one to make his fight. Turn off your computer, you only need a piece of paper and a stamp, you only need your voice. And courage.


[ open YouTube playlist]


Source: http://www.paolobarnard.info/intervento_mostra_go.php?id=175

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Best Duck Decoys On The Market

Club Bilderberg, Daniel Estulin interview

Friday, January 15, 2010

Dixit Games Of Strategy Solutions

Power to the People: For a change

Paul Barnard

People must learn to urgently return to the main character is information that civic action, and, indeed, never followers or fans of 'strong personalities' that know, they can, that count. The 'strong personalities' should instead become a 'small' to serve the strong, who are you people. Here are the steps to achieve this:

public Every time you hear or read the work of those who informs you, you have to impose upon you to think that it is only name, not oracles, but sources listen at a safe distance, among many other sources that will listen. You have to get to the point where there is no longer the relationship with the journalist 'character / star / expert', which is always seen as one of your consultant of many. To make it clear to the reader what should be the attitude of interior and exterior of a healthy citizen against those who informs them, chiuque he / she is, I ask you to imagine how the Board of Directors of a giant industry - eg. Microsoft Corporation - relates to their consultant.

The summons tells him without fuss "Please come forward, tell us," and then listen to him, "Well, thank you, please sit down." Point. And the consultant greets you and sets aside a small and secondary to the important task left to the executive manager. Now, an audience of healthy citizens must feel exactly like management, that is the center of power and decisions, and should reduce today's 'journalists / celebrities / experts' to the role of consultant.

Today, unfortunately, the opposite happens: the 'journalist / diva / expert' dominates, ADJUDGED, launches diktat, and the tiny little public adores him, admires him, and, worse, it brings together in clubs and fans 'parishes' almost always followed by the uncritical. And it is sadly symbolic that the imaginary conversation that I described above is the reality of today exactly the way at the end of the evening-discussions with the expert / star, is, however, accept the public when she asks timidly the word means' characters' they say "Please come forward, ask," and then "Fine, thank you, sit down," that is turning tiny, marginal. The 'characters' dominate, sign autographs, are at the center. You the edge. Absurd, harmful.

In this way the people are only driven to remain secondary, that is undone and will never grow. People need to rethink the Board of Directors, and always put himself at the center. (From the information and we)

In Action civic / political, to counter (if still possible) the power, here are the steps:

- studied in detail, to see who really is (not the Caste is not the mafia, not the Church), that history has had as far as it has arrived, with such weapons is moving, what are you planning for the future.
- To form into an army of activists of national scope. Then put aside the differences that separate i nostri gruppi che formano i Movimenti, cioè rinunciare ai nostri individualismi per un fronte comune, unico, compatto, disciplinato, implacabile di attivisti al lavoro ovunque, sempre, con linee guida universali, sempre le stesse e con metodi in perenne evoluzione.

- Capire che cosa, in questo periodo della Storia, innesca il cambiamento, quale vettore, quale tipo di interazione umana. Individuare queste chiavi di svolta con precisione, così come si isola una molecola benefica.
- Studiare di conseguenza una comunicazione immensamente abile per attirare l’attenzione del mondo della GENTE COMUNE.
- Studiare i metodi per rendere la comunicazione gradevole ma penetrante.
- Diffonderci nei LUOGHI DELLA GENTE COMUNE, implacabili, pazienti, tutto l’anno, per tentare di creare un consenso opposto a quello oggi dominante usando quei metodi attentamente studiati. Essere presenti in modo massiccio nelle scuole e università.
- Sopra ogni altra azione, ci deve essere il tentativo da parte degli attivisti di trovare l'ANTIDOTO alla paralisi della partecipazione dei cittadini alla polis. Se non sapremo sbloccare la cittadinanza paralizzata, inattiva, apatica di fronte a qualsiasi scandalo e persino orrore, abbiamo perso, perché quella paralisi è stata, è, e sarà l'arma finale del Potere.

- Essere molto ben finanziati, cioè seek and recruit sponsors 'enlightened' capable of seeing the long-term benefit of a more just world. Without funding it is useless to even think about the change.

- knowledge that is an uphill battle, as it is to invite millions of people to unpopular choices, to sacrifice, to mutations of lifestyles, but to be able to see, however, the FINAL VALUE of a world more in balance. That is to say: Today, the system gives you the illusion of quick cash ten but you do not realize that makes you lose a thousand, and we'll tell you that you'll want to lose today but earning ten thousand in your future. This is the logic of all hope.

There is no other road. There. (From High Octane Capitalism Ahead)



Source: http://www.paolobarnard.info/intervento_mostra_go.php?id=153

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Dixit Games Of Strategy Solutions Guide

Important Message for Teens! The future is in your hands. Hypocrisy

Is It Safe To Cut Heartgard Plus In Half

SpA

Some might ask "these days" disinformation (always happens) global public opinion why the "democratic" Obama has exactly the same political ideas of G. Bush (Sr. and Jr.). The answer is simple, there is neither right nor left ma un’unica idea circa la gestione del potere: problema-reazione-soluzione , uno schema elementare per consentire alle SpA che finanziano i partiti di poter rientrare sull’investimento (Obama) fatto.
Negli USA non esiste alcuna democrazia rappresentativa ma una serie di SpA che finanziano i loro interessi in due gruppi di persone chiamati “democratici” e “repubblicani”, spesso alcune SpA finanziano entrambi gruppi. Tutti sanno che questi “partiti” allevano i propri servi delle SpA nelle stesse università affinché “democratici” e “repubblicani” sviluppino capacità retoriche ed oratorie necessarie e sufficienti per manipolare le masse.

Therefore no wonder that Obama supports the "war for peace" just as his predecessor and orders, within NATO, in countries like Italy to send their soldiers' mission of peace. " This language is well told by a liar G. Orwell in 1984 and the fact that the real power no longer sit in the institutions 'democratic' has been denounced by many political scientists, citizens and journalists.
The Obama campaign has been funded also by the SpA who invented and sustained the global crisis and invest money in weapons and wars. In the U.S. it works as always, all journalists know that and just talk about lack of ethics and lack of true democracy.
Source: Top Contributors , opensecrets.org

How oldest example of private involvement in military affairs of a State, a prototype of a trend that will increase dramatically as a result, is usually cited the case of Vinnell Corporation. This military construction company, based in Virginia near the Pentagon and the CIA's central office, was the first in 1975 to win a tender for the training of military forces of a foreign country. The contract, worth $ 77 million, was signed with Saudi Arabia and was focused on the advanced level of education of the National Guard who had the task of protecting the oil fields. The agreement has been renovated over the years, and at this stage also includes forms of advice and preparation to counter the 'chemical defense, "to estimate the total value is about $ 500 million. (Source: Francis Vignarca, mercenaries SpA, BUR, 2004, p. 17).
In order to chance SpA some supporters of Obama are the same ones who "manage" the Italian public debt:

All this information
knew each other before the Americans went to vote and before the rhetoric of the media to manipulate the political image of Obama (who voted against the class action in USA - class action fariness Act of 2005) and before that many Europeans could delude ourselves about this person as a symbol of change.
Gino Strada: "Give the Nobel Peace Prize to the President of the United States is like giving the Nobel Prize for chastity Cicciolina or maybe for the not so young as the Nobel Prize for chastity to Patrick D'Addario"
That
SpA govern elected officials is obvious (the absence of representative democracy) ma una domanda legittima sorge spontanea: che relazione politica c’è fra l’SpA che acquista titolo di Stato e l’SpA che finanzia partiti e guerre?